My productivity is being wasted by either looking for someone to kill on Facebook, or discovering vomit-worthy ideas (shitting in your own hand while having a shower and throwing it to the toilet) on 9gag that will put Human Centipede movies to shame. If you are one of the lucky productive humans who doesn’t discover 9gag yet, let me give you a brief introduction about this thing. You see, 9gag is a battlefield where anyone can post images and hopes that his mom is not the only person who thinks he’s funny. Basically, people post images and battle towards one goal, to be on the Hot Page, the page where only images that received votes enough to form a nationwide cult are displayed.
There is this one interesting phenomenon in 9gag that caught my attention: Reposters. Some of them are innocent that the cat picture they are about to post is already posted. But some of them are genius douchebags who are aware that there are dozens of kitty posts out there, and yet they still decided to repost it. The saddest part is sometimes the repost receives more votes than the original one.
Put yourself in someone’s shoes who created an original content and someone reposts it and received more attention and votes than your work. What will you feel? A middle-finger salute is not enough to express the anger. And the pain is much worse than being circumcised twice… in the same day.
We cannot deny the fact that these reposters are douchebags who suck someone’s creativity to gain success. Oh wait… Does it ring a bell?
I realized, that very same pattern exists in the professional industry, somewhat 9gag for the big boys. Mark Zuckerberg was accused of copying Harvard Connections from the Winklevoss brothers (according to The Social Network movie). Then Google+ came, an obvious copy of Facebook according to Captain Obvious. Internet Explorer 9 was accused of copying Google Chrome. And hundreds of companies copying each other. But the question here is: Why is it sometimes the copycat (reposter) gain much more success than the original one? — Or why does using Internet Explorer is not yet listed as one of the Deadly Sins?
I think it is normal for someone to be hesitant about sharing his ideas to others. I myself is afraid of sharing an idea, a wild and kind of original idea I guess. I treasure my ideas like they are already marketable products. But then I’ve read this post from the legend, Jeff Atwood, with a painful introduction quote by Derek Sivers. I was stunned by the bitter truth.
It’s so funny when I hear people being so protective of ideas. (People who want me to sign an NDA to tell me the simplest idea.) To me, ideas are worth nothing unless executed. They are just a multiplier. Execution is worth millions.
Execution, that’s the factor that makes a copycat more successful than the original one. You have the ideas, but they have the better execution. Maybe that’s the reason behind my fear. I may have a brilliant idea, but the big boys have the brilliant execution. They have the advantage. An average caffeine-to-code machine like me is nothing compared to a team of nocturnal rockstars that the big boys have. What a pity world indeed.
Let’s look at a common example of this Idea-vs-Execution issue. So your best friend thought of doing some bodybuilding to look like a human uterus (Imagine). Then since being a uterus-shaped man is a very attractive idea for any normal person, you also decided to do some gym-time. You worked hard 5 days a week, while your best friend spend more time puking rainbows while reading Twilight books than doing bench press in the gym. The outcome is already obvious: your friend is gay, sorry. But more importantly you became more successful than him, although he is the first one to have the idea of hitting the gym.
See. Execution contributes more in one’s success. While ideas, if not executed, are just light bulbs in our head.
In the past I already tried to create some applications and products. During the inception of those crazy ideas, those eureka moments, I was like “This is it Zuckerberg! This is your end! I will be the new su— f*ck”. Yeah, every time, I mean every f*cking time, before I can even finish my villain-esque speech, reality always bites me. Actually “reality bites” is an understatement. Reality don’t just bite, it hits you in the groin with a jackhammer and look down to you while maniacally saying “You can’t execute it!”.
It’s my fault. I have the ideas, but I can’t execute. Lost of focus, cowardice, pessimism, and a lot of negative things. I don’t have enough drive to keep it going. But more importantly my biggest mistake is giving too much importance to the ideas. Refining the ideas to perfection without planning about how to execute all the sh*ts I’m thinking.
Okay. Enough already with this. Let’s work our ass and execute some ideas dude. Come on, close that Facebook tab!


Home
14 Comments
daftcoder is <3 :D
Pats! You don’t know the happiness I felt after reading your comment. :)
Thank you bro!
Ngbabasa ka rin pala ng coding horror. One of my favorite blogs. Napakainsightful (at enjoy basahin) lagi ng posts ni Jeff Atwood. Anyway, tama ka dun sa execution pero I think merong other small factors like luck and timing. Maganda ang timing ng FB kasi parang nakagamit na tayo (I think early users) ng friendster, mutliply at iba pa. Parang pag binigyan ka ng “Flying Car” right now, hindi mo pa alam kung gagawin mo dun. OK bad analogy.
I think a better look would be in games. There are hundreds of clones pero not each one stands out. How many tried to copy counter-strike? Call of Duty? World of Warcraft? GTA? Hindi pwedeng basta gayahin mo lang. You have to have the better game.
Anyway, execution will always win in the long term. Sabi nga din sa coding horror, speed of iteration. Looking back at (example) Google Chrome and Android. Sobrang bilis ng new versions and features comparing sa mga kalaban nila.
Great post!
Dagdag ko lang. Nakita ko tong vid. Binanggit nya na the difference between the original idea and the clone is that the one with the motivation to make it better will win.
My gumawa kasi nung invention nya. Sinend niya ung prototype dun sa isang toy comapany tapos ng labas sila ng clone nun. Eto naman ung super talented na builder na dapat eh kinikidnap na ng Discovery.
Thanks for the share ghost.
I’m an avid fan of Jeff Atwood bro. He’s one of the reason why I blog. :)
Yes. I agree. There are also small factors that contribute to our success, stated here http://techcrunch.com/2012/02/04/mark-zuckerbergs-6-ingredients-for-success/
I’m experiencing the same problem too, not only at work, but my life in general. I think everyone experiences this one way or another, though there are also people who have the capacity to execute, but don’t exactly have the idea. Regardless, these people, I’ve observed, are the ones who are able to go further than those who have ideas but don’t do shit at all.
Ideas are meaningless if they cannot be shared to the world in profound ways. As long as they’re not externalized, they’ll remain a treasure hidden in the abyss, with no one having knowledge of its existence aside from the one who hid/created it. It’s a great loss to the world if the good and genius people are the ones who remain silent.
Thanks for this article. Now to get myself a Nike ad pasted on my wall so I can actually stop lazing around. Keep writing! :)
I like what you said! Those people who have the execution can go further than those with ideas who don’t even make a single move.
I still believe that “ideas are far more powerful than guns”. But then again, we must use our idea and share it to the world. It has no worth if it will just remain in your head.
Okay! Come on! Let’s just do it! :)
There’s something I read about called the “Steve Jobs advantage” (at cracked.com lol). A lot of Apple’s success came from creating the “best version”/”best iteration” of a previously proven idea. (Before the Ipod there was mp3 players already) By looking at the issues present in previous executions of a good idea, he was able to eliminate and refine flaws.
I do believe that ideas are cheap and that you shouldn’t be too protective of your ideas. Firstly, you’re no special snowflake — everyone thinks they have this one idea that will revolutionize everything and so the tendency is to clam up about it. People in the startup community are generally respectful of other peoples ideas and I say discuss it and get criticized, and eventually develop your idea from all these comments. So to answer your question, I think execution is more important that having that one great idea. Execution essentially is the method to prove your idea.
I am actually guilty as well of seeing something online and saying “I thought of that” or “I could’ve built that”. All comes down to just shutting the fuck up and making something I guess. Execution doesn’t always have to mean building the “final version” of your idea as well. You can test the simplest form of your idea, your MVP, and see if it sticks. This article here is good reference on that. [how-i-quickly-test-and-validate-startup-ideas]
Thank you for the comprehensive response sir Andrei Navarro.
Now that I’ve heard that theory about Steve Jobs, I think you’re right! It’s true that Apple is just copying or just improving existing ideas. They are just executing it flawlessly. That’s a good lesson I guess.
About protecting my ideas. Yeah, I want to change that. I don’t want to be over protective with my ideas. Like what you’ve said there is a big chance that there is someone out there that have the same idea. I’m not a special snowflake indeed. I’m new to the startup community, that’s why I have no idea about its culture. Maybe you are right that generally the community respects other people’s ideas.
Thanks for dropping by sir! :)
I’ve always thought that my ideas are better off be kept as merely ideas until I’m done with the product itself – but then again, there are many factors that made those ideas JUST ideas for a long time LIKE forever, too many to mention though. But then again I’ll encounter something magical that will make me say “Fuck off, I’ve thought of that!” over the internet – meaning someone already made my idea a PRODUCT itself. Repeat.
It’s just like a teacher asking his students a question. You know the answer but you’re afraid you’re wrong so you won’t raise your hand. Then some brave soul will raise his hand and tell the answer himself though his not that confident too. Then you’ll just tell yourself you’ve thought about it. Darn it right?
So here I am saying that really, nothing will change with just ideas. How many projects did we discuss already and what of those was implemented or even started? You tell me. Moving our ass up and do the work is what we need to do. :)
So yeah, build up your ideas, do the work, share it to the world, if someone innovates it, then innovate it again! Explore, learn and innovate. That’s the world that we are living in. :)
Yo Rai.
I took me so long to reply on this one. My bad.
I smiled on your example about the teacher asking his students questions. I think almost all of us can relate to that scenario. Haha! The funny thing is that you tend to hate that brave soul who answered the question, even though he didn’t do anything to you.
“How many projects did we discuss already and what of those was implemented or even started?”
Oh fuck. That made me think. We really need to finish one of our ideas/products. Fuck this shit.
You had me at the ‘Or why does using Internet Explorer is not yet listed as the one of Deadly Sins?’…. hahahha loved the article… using humour to reveal the essence of a truth… very nice =)
Thanks for dropping by Ross.
That is not a joke bro! I’m serious about that! :) Anyway, thank you for pointing that out, I realized that my grammar there is wrong.
Pingback: A Couple of Ideas | Super Mekanismo